Skip to content

Compare

Scanner, automated pentest, or manual test?

An honest comparison of the ways to test a web application — including where our own products are not the right answer.

All four, side by side

Comparison of Vulnerability scanner and MyPentest and Traditional manual pentest and BugSnaps engagement
DimensionVulnerability scannerTypical; varies by toolMyPentestBugSnaps' automated pentestTraditional manual pentestTypical engagementBugSnaps engagementExpert-led, with MyPentest between tests
Attack-surface discoveryOften limited to the URLs or hosts you list; some crawl.Crawls the app, reads JavaScript for hidden endpoints, finds OpenAPI, GraphQL and login surfaces.Manual mapping by the tester within the agreed scope.Manual mapping plus reconnaissance, including forgotten subdomains and exposed services.
How findings are validatedMostly signature and version matching; false positives are common.Differential probes (baseline vs. probe vs. control), reproduce-before-report for access control, a confidence level on every finding.Verified by a person.Verified by a person, with reproduction steps for each finding.
ExploitationUsually none.None, by design: harmless canary inputs and read-only access checks. Nothing is changed or deleted.Controlled exploitation within the rules of engagement.Controlled, non-destructive exploitation agreed in writing.
Signed-in (authenticated) testingVaries; often needs manual session setup.Signs in as test accounts you supply and checks one user can't reach another's data.Yes, across the roles in scope.Yes, with an authorization matrix across every role.
API testingVaries by tool.Tests discovered REST and GraphQL endpoints, including object-level access with test accounts.Usually in scope when requested.Dedicated API testing mapped to the OWASP API Top 10.
Business-logic flawsNot detected.Flags tampering surfaces (e.g. client-controlled prices or roles) as leads — it can't judge intent.Yes — this is where human testers earn their keep.Yes, including chained attack paths.
ReportingLong lists, often with generic advice.Grouped findings with CVSS 3.1, confidence, evidence, fixes, attack paths and a remediation plan. PDF, HTML, Markdown, JSON, SARIF.A written report, commonly delivered after testing ends.Technical report plus executive summary for customers and auditors, and a walkthrough call.
Repeat testingEasy to re-run.Re-run any time; keep the DNS record and re-verification is instant.Point in time; retests are often extra.Retesting of fixes included; MyPentest covers the time between engagements.
SpeedMinutes to hours.Minutes to an hour for a typical small app.Days to weeks, plus scheduling.Typically 5–12 testing days, scoped up front.
Cost modelSubscription or per-asset licence.Free during launch; paid plans later.Per engagement.Fixed quote per scope, in writing before work starts.
What it can testDepends on the product: web, network, containers, cloud.Web applications and their APIs on domains you verify.Whatever is in scope.Web apps, APIs, networks, cloud configuration and code.
Developer workflowVaries; many integrate with CI.SARIF export for code-scanning tools, Markdown per finding for tickets, severity-based fix windows.Report handed over at the end.Critical issues raised the same day; fix support available.

We don't publish claims about specific competitors' products. Category columns describe typical tools and engagements.

Run a real pentest on your app — free.

Sign in, prove you own the domain, and MyPentest maps and tests it. No credit card.