Find. Fix. Fortify.
A vulnerability report is the start of the work. MyPentest gives your team evidence and remediation guidance so you can choose the next fix, verify it and keep a useful record of what changed.
A practical remediation workflow
Use the same evidence throughout the process. This workflow is a guide for your team, rather than a promise that the scanner will implement or approve your patch.
Review the affected endpoint, severity, confidence and reproduction details. Check which roles and routes the assessment reached before deciding what a finding means.
A finding your team can investigate
Use the remediation guidance to create a task with an owner and an acceptance test. Apply the fix at the authorization, input handling or configuration boundary that caused the issue.
A change with a clear acceptance test
Run another assessment after the fix is deployed, then compare the original evidence with the new result. Confirm the route and test accounts were still reachable before closing the task.
A reviewed record of the fix and retest
Web application vulnerability remediation
Use these examples to write actionable development tasks. Their order is a starting point; a finding's business impact, exposure and supporting evidence should guide your own queue.
Broken access control and IDOR / BOLA
Start with findings that may expose another user's records or allow a role to cross a permission boundary. Recheck authorization on the server for every protected object and action.
Example acceptance check
The owner can access the record; a different test account cannot.
Leaked keys and configuration exposure
Confirm whether a key is intended to be public and what access it grants. Revoke affected secrets, remove the exposure and review usage. Deleting a published secret alone does not invalidate it.
Example acceptance check
The old secret no longer works and a fresh deployment does not expose the replacement.
Injection, XSS and session weaknesses
Address the affected input path or session boundary with the appropriate server-side control. Use parameterized queries, context-aware output handling and explicit session lifecycle rules where relevant.
Example acceptance check
The original behavior is blocked and the legitimate user flow still works.
Headers, debug endpoints and known vulnerabilities
Validate the finding in its deployment context. Remove unnecessary exposure and apply the relevant update or configuration change. Prioritize reachable risks and business impact alongside severity.
Example acceptance check
The running application reflects the change, including its CDN or reverse proxy.
Your next pull request
Copy these steps into your issue tracker. A ticket should say how you will verify the change before it says the issue is closed.
If the original test cannot run, record why. An inconclusive retest is useful evidence about a coverage gap; it is not confirmation that the vulnerability disappeared.
Review our evaluation criteriaRecord the original finding, affected endpoint and application version.
Choose an owner and a deadline based on impact, reachability and confidence.
Write an acceptance test for the unsafe behavior and a control for legitimate behavior.
Deploy the fix to the environment you intend to verify.
Repeat the original scope and test roles; confirm authentication still succeeds.
Review new evidence and failures, then record fixed, still present or inconclusive.
Product status
The improvement workflow starts with the assessment and reports already in MyPentest. Planned conveniences are listed separately so you can make a decision using the current product.
These features are not currently available. No release date is promised here.
A useful first trial
Review the example report, verify an authorized staging domain, and configure realistic test accounts. Use the first assessment to decide whether the evidence and fix guidance fit how your team works.
A good trial leaves you with a clear task and a way to check it. Review the current free plan and severity visibility before you run; if you need deeper business-logic testing or a scoped retest engagement, talk with BugSnaps.
FAQ
MyPentest assesses a verified web application and reports findings with severity, confidence, evidence and remediation guidance. Your team implements the changes and can run another assessment to review the result. Use manual review for complex business logic and issues outside the automated assessment's scope.
Only if the relevant route, role and check were exercised under comparable conditions. A failed login, unreachable endpoint, changed scope or interrupted assessment can hide an issue. Treat that result as inconclusive until the original behavior and a legitimate control have been checked.
Scheduled retests and automatic diffing between assessments are on the MyPentest roadmap. Today, start another assessment yourself and compare the findings and evidence from your saved reports. Plan limits and available scan credits apply.
MyPentest provides assessment findings and remediation guidance. It does not automatically patch your application or certify that it is secure. Review each recommendation in the context of your code, test the change and verify the result before marking it resolved.
Review the example report, pick a staging application you own or have written permission to test, and verify its domain. Run a baseline assessment with suitable test accounts, then choose one finding to investigate, fix and retest. Check the current plan limits before starting.
Assess an application you are authorized to test, review the findings and build a practical remediation plan.