Compare · Web vulnerability scanner

MyPentest vs Acunetix: an honest comparison.

A vulnerability scanner providing dynamic web testing, API crawling, and proof-based validation features. Compare its workflow with MyPentest's hosted assessment of a verified application, including the limits of both approaches.

Start your free pentest See an example report

Facts about Acunetix checked on 2 October 2026 against their own pages.

At a glance

Compare the workflow your team needs.

MyPentest · by BugSnaps

A hosted automated penetration test for web apps and their APIs: discovery, 56 passive and safe-active checks, supported sign-in flows using supplied test accounts, and a report with evidence, CVSS and fixes.

Best for: Teams assessing a verified web app without installing a scanner, who can supply scoped test accounts and review coverage limits.

Acunetix · Invicti Security

A vulnerability scanner providing dynamic web testing, API crawling, and proof-based validation features.

Vendor product documentation

Best for: You require enterprise on-premises DAST deployment with a long-standing scanner track record.

This is a product-scope comparison, not a head-to-head detection benchmark. Best-fit recommendations are editorial judgments. Check the exact edition and validate it against the same authorized staging application, accounts and exclusions. No scanner can guarantee that every vulnerability was found.

How to evaluate Acunetix alternatives

Feature by feature

What MyPentest and Acunetix each do.

Including where MyPentest says no. Where Acunetix's site doesn't say, we don't guess.

Feature comparison of MyPentest and Acunetix
Feature	MyPentest	Acunetix
Getting started
Hosted workflow without installing a scanner	YesBrowser workflow at bugsnaps.in	YesCloud and on-premises installation available
Free plan, open source or trial	YesOne trial assessment; detailed high and critical findings need a paid plan	Not established by the linked sources
No personal LLM API key required	YesNo personal model key for scanning	YesCore managed scanner
Public pricing information	YesPlus is a one-time scan pack with no expiry; current prices appear below	Not established by the linked sources
Testing
Tests a running web application	YesDiscovery and 56 defined checks, subject to scan mode and reachable endpoints	Yes
Authenticated testing with configuration	PartlySupported logins and supplied test accounts; cross-user checks need suitable accounts and reachable records	YesLogin sequence recorder and macro support
API security testing	PartlyDiscovered REST, GraphQL and OpenAPI surfaces; discovery and permissions limit coverage	YesREST and GraphQL scanning
Exploit validation or manual attack tools	NoEvidence probes, not general exploitation or post-exploitation	PartlyProof-based validation on selected finding classes
Coverage beyond the web app
Network or infrastructure scanning	NoAutomated product focuses on web applications and APIs	Not established by the linked sources
Cloud or infrastructure-as-code checks	No	Not established by the linked sources
Source-code security analysis	No	Not established by the linked sources
Workflow
Separate testing service from the vendor	YesSeparate scoped BugSnaps engagements	Not established by the linked sources
CI/CD, API or ticketing integration	PartlySARIF and Markdown exports; no native pipeline integration	YesCI/CD pipeline integrations
Compliance-oriented reporting	NoEvidence, CVSS and CWE do not constitute compliance certification	PartlyCompliance-focused reporting templates
Open source or local deployment	NoHosted product is not an open-source scanner	Not established by the linked sources

Yes
Partly
No
Not established by the linked sources

Pros and cons

Strengths and trade-offs - ours too.

Every tool gives something up. Here's what each one does well, and what you accept by choosing it.

MyPentest

Strengths

Browser assessment of a verified app without scanner installation
Evidence, confidence and remediation with findings
Supported authenticated checks using supplied test accounts

Trade-offs

No source-code, cloud-configuration or network assessment in the automated product
No general exploit chains, custom scan rules or native CI integration
Discovery and credentials limit coverage; a clean run does not guarantee every vulnerability was found
Reports do not certify compliance or replace a scoped manual business-logic test

Acunetix

Strengths

Established DAST engine with deep vulnerability catalog
Proof-based confirmation on supported issues
On-premises and cloud deployment choices

Trade-offs

Annual per-target licensing model
Configuration complexity for modern SPAs
Scanner reports alone do not establish compliance

Pricing

What each one costs.

MyPentest

FreeFree - 1 free scan per account, once only
Plus₹499 once - 2 detailed scans per pack, no expiry

Paid through Razorpay, in rupees. Nothing renews automatically.

Full pricing

Acunetix

Licensing is typically scoped annually per target domain or web asset.
Review add-on costs for additional targets and API modules.

As listed on their site on 2 October 2026. Check theirs for current prices.

Acunetix's site

Selection criteria

Which workflow fits your requirements?

Choose MyPentest if…

You need an occasional hosted web-app assessment with evidence and remediation, and do not require the other product's wider platform or operator controls.

Run MyPentest free

Choose Acunetix if…

You require enterprise on-premises DAST deployment with a long-standing scanner track record.

Need more than any automated tool gives you? A BugSnaps manual pentest covers business logic and chained attacks, with retesting of fixes.

FAQ

MyPentest vs Acunetix: common questions.

How does MyPentest compare to Acunetix?

Acunetix is an established enterprise scanner requiring annual per-target licensing and configuration. BugSnaps MyPentest offers instant zero-setup browser testing, transparent scan packs, and automated dual-account BOLA verification.

Does Acunetix validate all vulnerabilities with proof?

Acunetix applies proof-based scanning to selected vulnerability classes like SQLi and command execution. Other findings require manual operator triage and verification.

Sources

Checked on 2 October 2026. Products change - if something here is out of date, tell us and we'll correct it. Acunetix is a trademark of its owner; BugSnaps is not affiliated with Invicti Security.

More comparisons

Try MyPentest before you decide.

Start your free pentest Book a security consultation