Compare · Enterprise AppSec & SAST platform

MyPentest vs Checkmarx: an honest comparison.

An enterprise application security suite centered around static code analysis (SAST), software supply chain security, and DAST integrations. Compare its workflow with MyPentest's hosted assessment of a verified application, including the limits of both approaches.

Start your free pentest See an example report

Facts about Checkmarx checked on 2 October 2026 against their own pages.

At a glance

Compare the workflow your team needs.

MyPentest · by BugSnaps

A hosted automated penetration test for web apps and their APIs: discovery, 56 passive and safe-active checks, supported sign-in flows using supplied test accounts, and a report with evidence, CVSS and fixes.

Best for: Teams assessing a verified web app without installing a scanner, who can supply scoped test accounts and review coverage limits.

Checkmarx · Checkmarx

An enterprise application security suite centered around static code analysis (SAST), software supply chain security, and DAST integrations.

Vendor product documentation

Best for: Your security programme is centered around static code analysis and software supply chain audits.

This is a product-scope comparison, not a head-to-head detection benchmark. Best-fit recommendations are editorial judgments. Check the exact edition and validate it against the same authorized staging application, accounts and exclusions. No scanner can guarantee that every vulnerability was found.

How to evaluate Checkmarx alternatives

Feature by feature

What MyPentest and Checkmarx each do.

Including where MyPentest says no. Where Checkmarx's site doesn't say, we don't guess.

Feature comparison of MyPentest and Checkmarx
Feature	MyPentest	Checkmarx
Getting started
Hosted workflow without installing a scanner	YesBrowser workflow at bugsnaps.in	YesCheckmarx One cloud platform
Free plan, open source or trial	YesOne trial assessment; detailed high and critical findings need a paid plan	Not established by the linked sources
No personal LLM API key required	YesNo personal model key for scanning	YesManaged engine
Public pricing information	YesPlus is a one-time scan pack with no expiry; current prices appear below	Not established by the linked sources
Testing
Tests a running web application	YesDiscovery and 56 defined checks, subject to scan mode and reachable endpoints	YesCheckmarx One DAST module
Authenticated testing with configuration	PartlySupported logins and supplied test accounts; cross-user checks need suitable accounts and reachable records	YesAuthenticated web scanning
API security testing	PartlyDiscovered REST, GraphQL and OpenAPI surfaces; discovery and permissions limit coverage	YesAPI security testing
Exploit validation or manual attack tools	NoEvidence probes, not general exploitation or post-exploitation	Not established by the linked sources
Coverage beyond the web app
Network or infrastructure scanning	NoAutomated product focuses on web applications and APIs	Not established by the linked sources
Cloud or infrastructure-as-code checks	No	PartlyKICS infrastructure-as-code analysis
Source-code security analysis	No	YesCore Checkmarx SAST engine
Workflow
Separate testing service from the vendor	YesSeparate scoped BugSnaps engagements	Not established by the linked sources
CI/CD, API or ticketing integration	PartlySARIF and Markdown exports; no native pipeline integration	YesDeveloper pipeline and IDE plugins
Compliance-oriented reporting	NoEvidence, CVSS and CWE do not constitute compliance certification	PartlyExecutive and regulatory compliance views
Open source or local deployment	NoHosted product is not an open-source scanner	Not established by the linked sources

Yes
Partly
No
Not established by the linked sources

Pros and cons

Strengths and trade-offs - ours too.

Every tool gives something up. Here's what each one does well, and what you accept by choosing it.

MyPentest

Strengths

Browser assessment of a verified app without scanner installation
Evidence, confidence and remediation with findings
Supported authenticated checks using supplied test accounts

Trade-offs

No source-code, cloud-configuration or network assessment in the automated product
No general exploit chains, custom scan rules or native CI integration
Discovery and credentials limit coverage; a clean run does not guarantee every vulnerability was found
Reports do not certify compliance or replace a scoped manual business-logic test

Checkmarx

Strengths

Deep static source-code vulnerability analysis
Software supply chain and open-source dependency scanning
Robust IDE and developer pull-request integrations

Trade-offs

High volume of theoretical code-level false positives
Enterprise-only licensing with substantial price entry point
Code analysis cannot verify real-world runtime access controls

Pricing

What each one costs.

MyPentest

FreeFree - 1 free scan per account, once only
Plus₹499 once - 2 detailed scans per pack, no expiry

Paid through Razorpay, in rupees. Nothing renews automatically.

Full pricing

Checkmarx

Enterprise pricing based on developer seats and scanned repositories.
Custom quotes negotiated via enterprise sales teams.

As listed on their site on 2 October 2026. Check theirs for current prices.

Checkmarx's site

Selection criteria

Which workflow fits your requirements?

Choose MyPentest if…

You need an occasional hosted web-app assessment with evidence and remediation, and do not require the other product's wider platform or operator controls.

Run MyPentest free

Choose Checkmarx if…

Your security programme is centered around static code analysis and software supply chain audits.

Need more than any automated tool gives you? A BugSnaps manual pentest covers business logic and chained attacks, with retesting of fixes.

FAQ

MyPentest vs Checkmarx: common questions.

Can static code scanning (SAST) replace dynamic testing (DAST)?

No. SAST analyzes uncompiled code without understanding runtime environments, authentication state, or cloud infrastructure configurations. BugSnaps DAST tests live running applications to verify that a flaw is truly exploitable.

Can BugSnaps MyPentest complement Checkmarx?

Yes. Many engineering teams use SAST in their IDEs for initial code feedback, and use BugSnaps MyPentest to validate deployed staging environments with proof-of-exploit verification before releasing to production.

Sources

Checked on 2 October 2026. Products change - if something here is out of date, tell us and we'll correct it. Checkmarx is a trademark of its owner; BugSnaps is not affiliated with Checkmarx.

More comparisons

Try MyPentest before you decide.

Start your free pentest Book a security consultation