Compare · Surface and application scanning
MyPentest vs Detectify: an honest comparison.
An attack-surface platform with authenticated DAST, API scanning and researcher-informed checks. Compare its workflow with MyPentest's hosted assessment of a verified application, including the limits of both approaches.
Facts about Detectify checked on 2 October 2026 against their own pages.
At a glance
Compare the workflow your team needs.
MyPentest · by BugSnaps
A hosted automated penetration test for web apps and their APIs: discovery, 56 passive and safe-active checks, supported sign-in flows using supplied test accounts, and a report with evidence, CVSS and fixes.
Best for: Teams assessing a verified web app without installing a scanner, who can supply scoped test accounts and review coverage limits.
Detectify · Detectify
An attack-surface platform with authenticated DAST, API scanning and researcher-informed checks.
Vendor product documentationBest for: You need surface visibility with recurring application tests and organization controls.
This is a product-scope comparison, not a head-to-head detection benchmark. Best-fit recommendations are editorial judgments. Check the exact edition and validate it against the same authorized staging application, accounts and exclusions. No scanner can guarantee that every vulnerability was found.
How to evaluate Detectify alternativesFeature by feature
What MyPentest and Detectify each do.
Including where MyPentest says no. Where Detectify's site doesn't say, we don't guess.
| Feature | MyPentest | Detectify |
|---|---|---|
| Getting started | ||
| Hosted workflow without installing a scanner | YesBrowser workflow at bugsnaps.in | Yes |
| Free plan, open source or trial | YesOne trial assessment; detailed high and critical findings need a paid plan | PartlyStarter and trial options; confirm usage scope |
| No personal LLM API key required | YesNo personal model key for scanning | YesCore platform |
| Public pricing information | YesPlus is a one-time scan pack with no expiry; current prices appear below | PartlyPlatform fees; added assets and environments cost extra |
| Testing | ||
| Tests a running web application | YesDiscovery and 56 defined checks, subject to scan mode and reachable endpoints | Yes |
| Authenticated testing with configuration | PartlySupported logins and supplied test accounts; cross-user checks need suitable accounts and reachable records | Yes |
| API security testing | PartlyDiscovered REST, GraphQL and OpenAPI surfaces; discovery and permissions limit coverage | YesREST and GraphQL |
| Exploit validation or manual attack tools | NoEvidence probes, not general exploitation or post-exploitation | Not established by the linked sources |
| Coverage beyond the web app | ||
| Network or infrastructure scanning | NoAutomated product focuses on web applications and APIs | PartlySurface and internal scanning; confirm protocols |
| Cloud or infrastructure-as-code checks | No | Not established by the linked sources |
| Source-code security analysis | No | Not established by the linked sources |
| Workflow | ||
| Separate testing service from the vendor | YesSeparate scoped BugSnaps engagements | Not established by the linked sources |
| CI/CD, API or ticketing integration | PartlySARIF and Markdown exports; no native pipeline integration | YesPlan-dependent integrations |
| Compliance-oriented reporting | NoEvidence, CVSS and CWE do not constitute compliance certification | PartlySeparate PCI ASV offering |
| Open source or local deployment | NoHosted product is not an open-source scanner | Not established by the linked sources |
- Yes
- Partly
- No
- Not established by the linked sources
Pros and cons
Strengths and trade-offs - ours too.
Every tool gives something up. Here's what each one does well, and what you accept by choosing it.
MyPentest
Strengths
- Browser assessment of a verified app without scanner installation
- Evidence, confidence and remediation with findings
- Supported authenticated checks using supplied test accounts
Trade-offs
- No source-code, cloud-configuration or network assessment in the automated product
- No general exploit chains, custom scan rules or native CI integration
- Discovery and credentials limit coverage; a clean run does not guarantee every vulnerability was found
- Reports do not certify compliance or replace a scoped manual business-logic test
Detectify
Strengths
- Surface and application workflows
- Authenticated crawling and fuzzing
- Researcher-informed tests
Trade-offs
- Platform fee may not be the total cost
- Check application, surface and internal scope separately
- Verify authentication success in your evaluation
Pricing
What each one costs.
MyPentest
- FreeFree - 1 free scan per account, once only
- Plus₹499 once - 2 detailed scans per pack, no expiry
Paid through Razorpay, in rupees. Nothing renews automatically.
Full pricingDetectify
- Published tiers include Starter through Enterprise.
- Added assets, domains, environments and IP ranges can increase cost.
As listed on their site on 2 October 2026. Check theirs for current prices.
Detectify's siteSelection criteria
Which workflow fits your requirements?
Choose MyPentest if…
You need an occasional hosted web-app assessment with evidence and remediation, and do not require the other product's wider platform or operator controls.
Run MyPentest freeChoose Detectify if…
You need surface visibility with recurring application tests and organization controls.
Need more than any automated tool gives you? A BugSnaps manual pentest covers business logic and chained attacks, with retesting of fixes.
FAQ
MyPentest vs Detectify: common questions.
Is Detectify only a public website scanner?
No. Reviewed pages describe surface monitoring, authenticated applications, API and internal options. The selected package determines scope.
Should I compare only the platform fee?
No. The pricing page lists added costs for assets, domains, environments and IP ranges. Compare your complete configuration.
Sources
Checked on 2 October 2026. Products change - if something here is out of date, tell us and we'll correct it. Detectify is a trademark of its owner; BugSnaps is not affiliated with Detectify.
More comparisons
- MyPentest vs Strix
- MyPentest vs XBOW
- MyPentest vs Astra Security
- MyPentest vs Intruder
- MyPentest vs Pentest-Tools.com
- MyPentest vs Burp Suite
- MyPentest vs ZAP
- MyPentest vs Nuclei
- MyPentest vs StackHawk
- MyPentest vs Invicti
- MyPentest vs Qualys WAS
- MyPentest vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec
- MyPentest vs Snyk
- MyPentest vs HCL AppScan
- All comparisons
Try MyPentest before you decide.
Sign in, prove you own the domain, and MyPentest maps and tests it. No credit card.