Skip to content

Compare · Code security and separate DAST

MyPentest vs Snyk: an honest comparison.

Snyk Code scans source code; the separate Snyk API & Web offering tests running applications. Compare its workflow with MyPentest's hosted assessment of a verified application, including the limits of both approaches.

Facts about Snyk checked on 2 October 2026 against their own pages.

At a glance

Compare the workflow your team needs.

MyPentest · by BugSnaps

A hosted automated penetration test for web apps and their APIs: discovery, 56 passive and safe-active checks, supported sign-in flows using supplied test accounts, and a report with evidence, CVSS and fixes.

Best for: Teams assessing a verified web app without installing a scanner, who can supply scoped test accounts and review coverage limits.

Snyk · Snyk

Snyk Code scans source code; the separate Snyk API & Web offering tests running applications.

Vendor product documentation

Best for: You need code and dependency feedback or its separate runtime scanner in a broader programme.

This is a product-scope comparison, not a head-to-head detection benchmark. Best-fit recommendations are editorial judgments. Check the exact edition and validate it against the same authorized staging application, accounts and exclusions. No scanner can guarantee that every vulnerability was found.

How to evaluate Snyk alternatives

Feature by feature

What MyPentest and Snyk each do.

Including where MyPentest says no. Where Snyk's site doesn't say, we don't guess.

Feature comparison of MyPentest and Snyk
FeatureMyPentestSnyk
Getting started
Hosted workflow without installing a scanner
YesBrowser workflow at bugsnaps.in
YesRequirements vary by product
Free plan, open source or trial
YesOne trial assessment; detailed high and critical findings need a paid plan
PartlyFree Code offer; not proof of free DAST
No personal LLM API key required
YesNo personal model key for scanning
YesCore managed products
Public pricing information
YesPlus is a one-time scan pack with no expiry; current prices appear below
PartlyReview the selected product's offer
Testing
Tests a running web application
YesDiscovery and 56 defined checks, subject to scan mode and reachable endpoints
PartlyAPI & Web, not Snyk Code
Authenticated testing with configuration
PartlySupported logins and supplied test accounts; cross-user checks need suitable accounts and reachable records
PartlyAPI & Web lists SSO/OpenID scans
API security testing
PartlyDiscovered REST, GraphQL and OpenAPI surfaces; discovery and permissions limit coverage
PartlyAPI & Web
Exploit validation or manual attack tools
NoEvidence probes, not general exploitation or post-exploitation
Not established by the linked sources
Coverage beyond the web app
Network or infrastructure scanning
NoAutomated product focuses on web applications and APIs
Not established by the linked sources
Cloud or infrastructure-as-code checks
No
PartlyIaC code checks, not a cloud-account audit
Source-code security analysis
No
YesSnyk Code
Workflow
Separate testing service from the vendor
YesSeparate scoped BugSnaps engagements
Not established by the linked sources
CI/CD, API or ticketing integration
PartlySARIF and Markdown exports; no native pipeline integration
YesRepository and developer workflows
Compliance-oriented reporting
NoEvidence, CVSS and CWE do not constitute compliance certification
Not established by the linked sources
Open source or local deployment
NoHosted product is not an open-source scanner
Not established by the linked sources
  • Yes
  • Partly
  • No
  • Not established by the linked sources

Pros and cons

Strengths and trade-offs - ours too.

Every tool gives something up. Here's what each one does well, and what you accept by choosing it.

MyPentest

Strengths

  • Browser assessment of a verified app without scanner installation
  • Evidence, confidence and remediation with findings
  • Supported authenticated checks using supplied test accounts

Trade-offs

  • No source-code, cloud-configuration or network assessment in the automated product
  • No general exploit chains, custom scan rules or native CI integration
  • Discovery and credentials limit coverage; a clean run does not guarantee every vulnerability was found
  • Reports do not certify compliance or replace a scoped manual business-logic test

Snyk

Strengths

  • Source feedback during development
  • Separate runtime API and web tests
  • Developer integrations and fix guidance

Trade-offs

  • Code tests do not replace runtime access control
  • Review entitlements by product
  • Check languages and authentication support

Pricing

What each one costs.

MyPentest

  • FreeFree - 1 free scan per account, once only
  • Plus₹499 once - 2 detailed scans per pack, no expiry

Paid through Razorpay, in rupees. Nothing renews automatically.

Full pricing

Snyk

  • Snyk Code advertises a free offering with plan-dependent features.
  • Confirm API & Web entitlements separately; free Code does not imply free DAST.

As listed on their site on 2 October 2026. Check theirs for current prices.

Snyk's site

Selection criteria

Which workflow fits your requirements?

Choose MyPentest if…

You need an occasional hosted web-app assessment with evidence and remediation, and do not require the other product's wider platform or operator controls.

Run MyPentest free

Choose Snyk if…

You need code and dependency feedback or its separate runtime scanner in a broader programme.

Need more than any automated tool gives you? A BugSnaps manual pentest covers business logic and chained attacks, with retesting of fixes.

FAQ

MyPentest vs Snyk: common questions.

Is Snyk only a source-code scanner?

No. Snyk Code performs source analysis, but the current platform also lists Snyk API & Web DAST. Compare product-level scope.

Can MyPentest replace Snyk Code?

No. MyPentest does not read repositories or dependency manifests. Runtime and code tests can complement each other.

Try MyPentest before you decide.

Sign in, prove you own the domain, and MyPentest maps and tests it. No credit card.